Kissalinda

kissalinda


— Kissalinda Report User
I don't know who's to blame, but the fact is that people just aren't happy 27 comments
kissalinda · 7 years ago
There will always be people who have it worse than you, but other people's problems should not belittle your own. Just because a mother has lost her child to malaria in one country does not mean the mother struggling to find a job to feed her children in another country shouldn't be complaining, their problems are both valid.
1 · Edited 7 years ago
One side 10 comments
kissalinda · 7 years ago
They could have fit all this on a small note card! Look how much space is wasted between the formulas
9
The cute side of tumblr isn't the brightest I admit 9 comments
kissalinda · 7 years ago
They're called "skinny pigs", their name is literally a pun.
6
It was a weapon of mass lactation 44 comments
kissalinda · 7 years ago
Nope I wouldn't care still, just as I said earlier he's not spitting on me, he's spitting on the floor.The title says she squirted her boob at the other person, not on them.
1
It was a weapon of mass lactation 44 comments
kissalinda · 7 years ago
The article says she squirted milk at them, not on them. If you spat on the floor because you didn't like something I said I dont think I would care much.
4
Shit man! Shit! 11 comments
kissalinda · 7 years ago
Was she really "his girl" or was he just trying to pick her up as well?
6
Getting around divorce settlement 10 comments
kissalinda · 7 years ago
If I ever get a divorce, my spouse can have everything, the house, the cars, just as long as I get some custody of my kids. Everything else is replaceable.
11
It was a weapon of mass lactation 44 comments
kissalinda · 7 years ago
It's ok she only had them set to "stun" and not "kill"
6
It was a weapon of mass lactation 44 comments
kissalinda · 7 years ago
It's also pretty safe to say the breast milk didn't even touch him. The title says squirted at him, not on him.
6
Science b*tch! 56 comments
kissalinda · 7 years ago
Of course they could be cloned again, but it just seems sad and unethical to just continually clone them so poachers could continue to kill them and get rich off it. It would also suck to clone them just so they could die from climate change all over again
-_- hopefully everything goes well, it would be awesome to see them in person.
1 · Edited 7 years ago
Deal with it 9 comments
kissalinda · 7 years ago
This isn't really an unpopular opinion, a lot of people prefer the colder weather.
1
Don't f*ck with welders and mechanics 36 comments
kissalinda · 7 years ago
Yeah this guy destroyed half the town because he was angry, what a dick move. What are all the people who's homes and businesses were destroyed going to do?
3
Science b*tch! 56 comments
kissalinda · 7 years ago
True, I think I saw a post a while back about trying to flood the market with fake rhino horns in order to push the poachers out of the market. I've also seen them dyeing elephant tusks with a pink dye in order to ruin it, it doesn't even hurt the elephants. Hopefully they will do something similar with mammoths in order to protect them as well.
1
Science b*tch! 56 comments
kissalinda · 7 years ago
Of course they would be safe until they could be poached off in the wild. Poaching has made both rhinos and elephants very near extinction, it's very possible for it to happen to mammoths as well. We try to protect elephants and rhinos but there is only so much we can do. Of course this isn't a sure thing, but it would really be sad to bring them back from extinction, just to watch them go extinct once again. Another commenter even mention climate change killing them, it just kind of seems like we're setting them up for failure.
1
Science b*tch! 56 comments
kissalinda · 7 years ago
It may not be dangerous for us, but seems like a bad idea for the mammoth themselves. We still have a pretty big illegal ivory trade, and I'm sure mammoth ivory would be worth even more. If the mammoths weren't highly protected its likely that they'd be poached into extinction once again.
1
I have nothing against boobies 22 comments
kissalinda · 7 years ago
Of course they're equally erotic, clothed or not its the same thing. Many men actually prefer women to be covered as it adds a little mystery, hence why lingerie exsists. Women are completely clothed in public but that doesn't stop men from checking them out. Breasts are not genitals, they are just sexualized just as many other body parts could be. Many men have foot fetishes, or like women's legs, or hips, or butt, or stomach. The female body is highly sexualized and just because it gives someone a hard-on doesn't give reason for it to be covered.
I wonder how they are going to get around this 53 comments
kissalinda · 7 years ago
There's girl scouts.... Instead of making a big deal about girls not being able to be a boy scout, they could just join the girl scouts.
10
A keen observation by a fine scholar 8 comments
kissalinda · 7 years ago
I think they were insinuating that her boyfriend/husband should be doing it and not her because shes a lady.
4
A cat with a soul 4 comments
kissalinda · 7 years ago
Though this is pretty cute be very careful around cats if you are pregnant, the bacteria in their feces and urine can be very harmful to pregnant women and their babies!
Don't ever print on the wrong side of photo paper 9 comments
kissalinda · 7 years ago
Don't let these comments get to you, your children are beautiful and I'm sure they will grow in to their abnormal misshapen features...
6
Yeah! Suck it Bront! 19 comments
kissalinda · 7 years ago
Who the hell would want to go to heaven if there were no dogs there!?
1
A keen observation by a fine scholar 8 comments
kissalinda · 7 years ago
What's wrong is she isn't putting it on the bottom rack where it belongs, she's wasting basket space.
5
Perfect whisky 5 comments
kissalinda · 7 years ago
Well if she's a "woman" I assume she's older than 18... Nobody calls a little girl or teenager a woman, maybe a "young lady", but not a woman. This post makes no sense.
2
Changed my way of thinking 9 comments
kissalinda · 7 years ago
I thought this quote was different. I thought it was holding on to a grudge, not anger, which makes more sense. Anger would definitely hurt the person you are angry at, but refusing to forgive and holding on to a grudge just kind of hurts yourself.
Daily Dose #44 15 comments
kissalinda · 7 years ago
Its pretty hard to do this when they're running away from you.
5