Of course, the teacher probably didn't make the worksheet and misread what the question was actually asking. I don't think they intentionally counted it wrong just because it wasn't "their answer", but counted it wrong because they skimmed the question and thought it asked for something else. I bet if it was brought to their attention they'd give the kid points, heck I'd give him extra credit for paying more attention to the question than i did!

I'd like to add to the list: ring size
That way in case you need it when buying a gift, and so you don't spoil the surprise if you plan on proposing with a ring that already fits. It may also save you some money as some rings or jewelers will charge to resize a ring if you got it wrong.

Well I'm sure they understand the material it's just simple fractions, but they're probably just following the curriculum and are even too lazy to make their own worksheets. And apparently too lazy to read them thoroughly before giving it to their students as well.

Its not really limited thinking it was probably just a mistake. The teacher likely didn't make the worksheet and didnt read the question properly, they then graded the answer on what they thought the question asked for. That's why the teachers answer doesn't make sense as a possible answer, but the teachers answer is based off what they thought the question asked, as they likely skimmed over it. The kids answer was right according to what the question really asked, but it was counted wrong likely because of a simple mistake, not because they are trying to limit this childs thinking.

Its possible they knew to drown her in the tank as well, knowing any evidence left on her would be destroyed. They also didn't show up on any sort of security footage, if an employee is the killer they must have planned this. I'm not sure what kind of security cameras they have in the hotel, but you'd think they would have cameras in hallways and stairwells at least. Just footage of the stairwell or maybe a hallway would have shown what really happened.

Oh I don't mean the killer had intentions to kill her when high, its possible the employees actions when high caused her death. Such as being caught up in each others paranoia, the employee helped her to the roof by unlocking the stairwell and disarming the alarm. I don't believe finger prints really remain on anything if submerged or some other foreinsic substances either. I think thats why its considered near impossible for cases to be solved if the body is in water for a certain period of time.

It's possible it's a combination of both, she could have been on ecstasy at the time which would account for her strange behavior in the video. Due to her vulnerability of being high and roaming the hotel an employee could have decided to kill her, in turn disarming the alarm and opening the hatch of the tank. Or perhaps the employee was high as well when doing all this. Even if the alarm was faulty, she would still need a key to open the hatch, no key was found near or on her so an employee must have been involved some how.

Someone dumped their trash on this guys land, but the dumbasses had envelopes in the trash with their names and address on it. So he found their house and dumped a bunch of garbage on their lawn as revenge.

Do a bit more research before you defame a charity by spreading missleading information about a company that is actually helping their cause.

Profit is made only after all expenses have already been paid. Salary/wages are an expense. Same concept with a non-profit Universities, the professors and administrators are not volunteers, they get paid, but the University is not allowed to keep the money after all expenses have been paid. Non-profits pay their employees, they are just not legally allowed to keep the profits they make after all their expenses have been paid off, they must either donate the profits or invest it back into the company to further their cause. I've heard this 20% argument before, but this is 20% to cancer research only. They donate to other areas related to breast cancer, such as informational prevention efforts, screenings, and breast cancer education. Most of their profits go to educating the public about breast cancer prevention and early detection, some to helping with treatments, some to research, and some to making breast cancer screenings more affordable or available.

Yeah a ban on them buying alcohol would be a pretty good idea, I also agree that the punishments for doing no harm should be very severe. People think they're invincible and that nothing is going to happen, but we all know that's not true. I also believe they should be more tactical with DUI checkpoints, in my town they tend to have them on weekends but just at random areas in town. They should have them in strategic areas they know people will be drinking, such as outside sporting events, bars/clubs, and concerts. If you want to drink at these events that's fine, but have a designated driver or call a cab/uber, don't be an asshole and drive drunk.

Its a bit infuriating that people are killed because someone decides to drive drunk. I feel like if you are convicted of a DUI you license should be revoked forever or at least something worse that the current punishments, perhaps even prison time, the law should be more strict. They endanger peoples lives and get a slap on the wrist, DUI punishments should be severe so we can hopefully make stories like this a rarity.

Yes I have to agree. 4+ years of hard work and determination does not equal a single test for a license. No, a degree does not make you a genius but you can bet your ass that person knows their field and had the determination to aquire that degree. Stop trying to demote those who seek higher education just because you chose a different path.

Just crouch down like a goblin, scrape your naked body against the textured wall, and viola! A comfortable showering experience in that tiny, decorative waterfall!